not really, no

being honest would be to just adjust the limits rather than adding piecewise limitations

but of course with honesty comes that people can actually gauge your product accurately and they may not want that

But the limits apply to all users. I doubt non-OpenClaw users want to pay $XX more to subsidize OpenClaw users.

it amounts to service limit obfuscation, and their market are very clued about that

nobody wants them to add fineprint every time users find effective ways to actually use the service to its advertised limits, it only benefits those who want to be milked for recurring revenue for sporadic usage while paying handsomely for the privilege

Feel free to ask for takeaway at an "all-you-can-eat" buffet. That'll show those rubes eating merely a single meal at the restaurant.