News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by mh- on Friday April 03, 2026 @02:40PM (#47630389)
> compared to other markup languages

I think it would be easier for me to appreciate your comment if you named some of these other languages. Markdown is the only standardized one I regularly come across that I type by hand, these days.

What are you contrasting to?

As for Markdown specifically- the only thing I regularly mix up is the syntax for links. I frequently reverse the [] and (). But that's just because I don't use it enough to have the muscle memory.

Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by xigoi on Friday April 03, 2026 @02:50PM (#47630526)
> I think it would be easier for me to appreciate your comment if you named some of these other languages.

HTML? Also my markup language I created for myself, which is currently not published.

Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by mkldd on Friday April 03, 2026 @03:23PM (#47630962)
my girlfriend goes to another school
Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by nickloewen on Saturday April 04, 2026 @01:43AM (#47636185)
I used to flip the link syntax all the time too. What finally helped me to remember it was noticing how I write links in plaintext emails.

In email, I naturally write things like "...on the example website (www.example.com)..."

Markdown keeps those () in the same place, and just adds the [] so you can delimit the visible text: "...on the [example website](www.example.com)..."

Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by mschnell on Saturday April 04, 2026 @01:58AM (#47636263)
I remember it like this: If you squint the brackets around the link text make a rectangle and look almost like a button you can press. [Press here](to.go.there)
Re:Why the heck are we still using Markdown? by klez on Saturday April 04, 2026 @04:27AM (#47637093)
> the only thing I regularly mix up is the syntax for links. I frequently reverse the [] and ()

I remember it as passing parameters to a function that requires an URL as an argument. Maybe it's not the most straightforward way, but it works for me