News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; the... by applfanboysbgon on Thursday April 02, 2026 @06:43PM (#47621155)
The current solution is literally causing problems in space. Space-grade engineering is expensive, but having things go wrong on your already very expensive mission is even more expensive.
Re:Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; the... by dotancohen on Thursday April 02, 2026 @07:13PM (#47621415)
Until we've had this failure, I do agree that using COTS software was the logical choice. And now we know better.
Re:Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; the... by tremon on Friday April 03, 2026 @12:17PM (#47628558)
Sure, but people who didn't know better until this particular incident do not deserve the title "engineer". Being able to classify and manage risks before they happen is engineering 101.
Re:Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; the... by dotancohen on Sunday April 05, 2026 @03:10PM (#47652812)
Engineering requires working around constraints as well - and a major constraint of any project I've worked on was budget. If they wrote a new email client and it had some bug, we'd be laughing about why they didn't use one of the COTS email clients.
Re:Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; the... by orf on Friday April 03, 2026 @07:21AM (#47625391)
It’s a personal communication device. It’s not mission critical.