News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by iamnothere on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @11:51AM (#47602513)
This may be a “joke”, but it’s disturbing to see people clamoring to deny others their freedom in a FOSS context.

Want to use IPv6? Fine. But don’t try to remove v4 support from people who have built stable networks around it.

You won’t be able to force the world to switch to IPv6 with tricks like this, any more than you can force old industrial machines to stop using ancient 486es as controllers. There is a lot of old equipment in the world.

IPv6 was built to work alongside v4, and there is no reason to change that.

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by embedding-shape on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @11:54AM (#47602554)
> it’s disturbing to see people clamoring to deny others their freedom in a FOSS context

How does "allow building Linux to be IPv6-only" somehow "deny others their freedom" exactly? I'm willing to wager most distributions will still be dual v4+v6, but if they aren't, isn't that something for you to bring up with your distribution rather than that the kernel just allows something?

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by iamnothere on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @12:02PM (#47602669)
Coupling this patch with language about “legacy IP”, along with the follow up comments from the person who submitted the patch, it is clear that the submitter is hostile towards IPv4. I also see hostility towards IPv4 in the comments here and other similar discussions.

I have no problem with allowing optional IPv4 or IPv6 only builds as long as both are kept well-maintained.

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by embedding-shape on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @12:05PM (#47602718)
> it is clear that the submitter is hostile towards IPv4

But so what? It still doesn't remove v4, in any shape or form, and if that was proposed to the kernel, I'm again fairly confident it'd be rejected.

> I also see hostility towards IPv4 in the comments here and other similar discussions

Ah, yeah that might be. I just saw your comment first, with no context of what you were actually answering, so it kind of looks like you're replying "to the submission", which really isn't denying any freedoms, I guess I was confused about that, my bad. Still, wouldn't it be better to answer directly to those comments, rather than "replying" to an argument/debate that is actually happening elsewhere?

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by iamnothere on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @12:15PM (#47602844)
Somehow IPv4 versus IPv6 has become one of those noxious political-technical debates like Android versus Apple or GPL versus BSD/MIT, in which both sides are dug in and think that the other side must be destroyed.

The reason that I don’t like seeing patches like this, even as a “joke”, is that there are real people who would like to see IPv4 removed (possibly by government intervention) in order to achieve their dream of an IPv6 only internet. The whole idea is preposterous, but here we are. It’s about as realistic as banning cars but that doesn’t stop the endless flame wars about it.

Someone has to step in to point out that v4 and v6 were designed to coexist, this is fine, please don’t remove common standards for your personal preferences.

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by tart-lemonade on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @04:03PM (#47605822)
It's not wrong or unfair to call IPv4 a legacy technology. Lots of legacy technologies persist well beyond their intended lifespans; we should have moved to IPv6 (or at least went dual-stack everywhere) decades ago.
Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by budman1 on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @12:00PM (#47602639)
GPL Code.

You want IP4V, put it back. Should be a couple of minutes with diff and patch. You want IPV6 only, vi is available, get to it.

Ohhh.. You are concerned about the operating system given to you for free.

Get over it.

(my personal opinion is, ipv4 will be used for the next 100 years, but Open Source / GPL is about freedom)

Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by zamadatix on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @01:11PM (#47603662)
The patchset is an April fools joke and even then it's not going this far.
Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by bladeee on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @12:01PM (#47602651)
What? Freedom to opt in or out is good either way.
Re:New Patches Allow Building Linux IPv6-Only, Option to Dep... by traderj0e on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @06:02PM (#47607101)
v6 was meant to succeed v4, not work alongside it. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8200#section-1