News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by bitwank on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:04PM (#47544513)
Nope. It’s like thinking you can overthrow the government by littering. It’s just being lame. If you’re going to be lame to other people, don’t gloat about your lameness online. “If everybody littered, they’d have to do something about it!”
Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by croemer on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:35PM (#47544912)
It's not littering. It shows why fax is stupid and they should accept email. Littering has no such benefit.
Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by autoexec on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:53PM (#47545182)
It's needlessly generating excessive amounts of trash and waste. It's wasting tax money. It's hurting the next blind person who won't be able to fax his documents because the machine is down/overloaded. It does not show why fax is stupid. It shows that faxing reams of unnecessary paperwork is stupid. It does not show that they should accept PDFs over email (genuinely a great way to get hacked). There is no benefit in trying to DoS the SSA office.
Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by mrgoldenbrown on Sunday March 29, 2026 @03:38PM (#47566463)
The employee probably already knows fax is stupid, and was probably looking forward to the proposed new secured document portal, but the legislature voted down the funding again this year so they could claim to be fiscally responsible. (Don't know the author but I do know govt workers who have expressed this kind of frustration ) Blind author needs to piss off their legislator, not a cog in the machine.
Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by bmurphy1976 on Friday March 27, 2026 @01:02PM (#47545299)
You kind of missed my point but that's OK. You can agree with or disagree with the action OP took, I'm not making a judgement call on that.

What I'm responding to the the notion that "no action you can take matters." Specifically this:

>Individual human beings acting individually are totally irrelevant when it comes to the behavior of large organizations.

I just don't believe that. Small actions do matter and are necessary because they enable the big actions later. You have to start somewhere. Even if it feels insurmountable. No major change ever just happened in isolation, it always happens when enough people have had enough and fought back enough that the change was inevitable.

Re:The 'paperwork flood': How I drowned a bureaucrat before ... by ryandrake on Friday March 27, 2026 @01:27PM (#47545675)
What's missing is coordination. Coordinated individuals taking actions together can change things. But just relying on individuals stochastically, randomly acting doesn't work. You can't random-walk your way to political change, even if a lot of people are random-walking in one direction.

Worker rights didn't just spontaneously appear because enough people wanted them. They came about through organizing, coordinating and leading. Same for Women's suffrage, Civil rights, gay rights...