Re:Agent-to-Agent Pair Programming
by axldelafosse on Friday March 27, 2026 @02:58AM
(#47539759)
I created the first version of loop after getting tired of doing this manually!
I’m going to take a look today!
Claude is also good at that. I made a habit of asking "are you sure?" after a complex task. It usually says it overlooked something.
I find both to be true. I use Claude for most of the implementation, and Codex always catches mistakes. Always. But both of them benefit from being asked if they’re sure they did everything.
Do you see any benefit in doing this locally versus having Codex review the PR Claude generates?
Re:Agent-to-Agent Pair Programming
by axldelafosse on Friday March 27, 2026 @01:41PM
(#47545852)
The feedback loop is faster. But PR reviews are still useful as they are multiplayer (meaning that you and another human reviewer can talk about a specific agent's comment directly on the diff, which is very useful sometimes).
I do find Codex very good at reviewing work marked as completed by Claude, especially when I get Claude to write up its work with a why,where & how doc.
It’s very rare Claude has fully completed the task successfully and Codex doesn’t find issues.