News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Olympic Committee Announces a Broad Ban of Transgender Athletes in Womens Events. Parent comment

Re:Olympic Committee Announces a Broad Ban of Transgender At... by appreciatorBus on Thursday March 26, 2026 @09:28PM (#47538046)
> Genspect, which is also a biased source on the subject:

Organization that supports position <x> supports position <x>.

If Genspect can be discarded as being a biased source, then so can WPATH and every other org supporting gender ideology.

Given the fraught nature of the debate, Wikipedia seems like a poor source for determining the bias of players in the debate - the most passionate debaters have plenty of time to just edit Wikipedia.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Olympic Committee Announces a Broad Ban of Transgender At... by Ralfp on Thursday March 26, 2026 @10:01PM (#47538295)
Can you explain what „gender ideology” is supposed to mean?

The primary issue with Genspect is poor scientific rigour applied to their publications, as I have shown above. Pretty much „if it fits our platform, we will spread it”.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Olympic Committee Announces a Broad Ban of Transgender At... by appreciatorBus on Thursday March 26, 2026 @10:31PM (#47538518)
WPATH : if it fits our platform, we will spread it.
[ Parent | on HN ]