Re:
by andrew_zhong on Thursday March 26, 2026 @05:37AM
(#47528375)
We do see fewer invalid JSONs on latest bigger LLMs but still can happen on smaller and cheaper models. There is also case when input is truncated or a required field not found, which are inherently difficult.
On XML vs JSON, I think the goal here is to generate typed output where JSON with zod shines - for example the result can type check and be inserted to database typed columns later
Re:
by faangguyindia on Thursday March 26, 2026 @05:48AM
(#47528445)
Thing is even with XML LLM will fail every now and then.
I've built an agent in both tool calling and by parsing XML
You always need a self correcting loop built in, if you are editing a file with LLM you need provide hints so LLM gets it right the second time or 3rd or n time.
Just by switching to XML you'll not get that.
I used to use XML now i only use it for examples in in system prompt for model to learn. That's all
Re:
by andrew_zhong on Thursday March 26, 2026 @05:57AM
(#47528488)
Agreed - in this project I did a one path sanitation to recover invalid optional / nullable fields or discard invalid objects in nested array.
I know multi path LLM approaches exist: e.g. generating JSON patches
Also, a model can always use a proxy to turn your tool calls into XML
And feed you back json right away and you wouldn't even know if any transformation did take place.