News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by cubefox on Thursday March 26, 2026 @02:09AM (#47527123)
Well, it would be AGI if you could connect a camera to it to solve it, similar to how blind people would be able to solve it if you restored their eyesight. But if the lack of vision is a fundamental limitation of their architecture, then it seems more fair not to call them AGI.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by Marha01 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @03:13AM (#47527484)
People blind from birth literally lack the neural circuits to comprehend visual data. Are they not intelligent?
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by cubefox on Thursday March 26, 2026 @03:25AM (#47527576)
I think they don't actually lack them, or lack only a small fraction (their brains are ≈99% like a normal human brain), such that if they were an AI model, they could be fairly trivially upgraded with vision capability.
Re:ARC-AGI-3 by maldev on Thursday March 26, 2026 @11:22AM (#47531641)
I think I can confidently say they are not visually intelligent at all.

If you were phrasing things to quantify intelligence, you would have a visual intelligence pillar. And they would not pass that pillar. It doesn't make them dysfunctional or stupid, but visual intelligence is a key part of human intelligence.

Re:ARC-AGI-3 by notnullorvoid on Thursday March 26, 2026 @02:46PM (#47534166)
Visual intelligence is a near meaningless term as it's almost entirely dependant on spatial intelligence. The visually impaired do have high spatial intelligence, I wouldn't be surprised if their spatial intelligence is actually higher on average than those without visual impairment.