Re:"I think you will all appreciate this person's commenting...
by lucian1900 on Tuesday November 06, 2012 @07:03AM
(#4748004)
It's still worse than ODT (which itself isn't exactly pretty), for no good reason. That's sad.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:"I think you will all appreciate this person's commenting...
by SideburnsOfDoom on Tuesday November 06, 2012 @07:43AM
(#4748115)
ODT is also XML-based, to Docx's problems compared to ODT can't be blamed on XML.
Re:"I think you will all appreciate this person's commenting...
by lucian1900 on Tuesday November 06, 2012 @09:21AM
(#4748455)
I never said it has anything to do with XML. OOXML is extremely complex for little reason. Even though it is also quite complex, ODT is much, much simpler.
Re:"I think you will all appreciate this person's commenting...
by makomk on Wednesday November 07, 2012 @07:07AM
(#4753099)
There are actually reasons for some of OOXML's weirdness, just not good ones. For instance, it appears the reason why OOXML is pretty much the only XML-based document format which doesn't use a mixed content model is because there's a huge amount of prior art that'd have made it impossible to patent if they had. (Microsoft tried anyway though.)
Re:"I think you will all appreciate this person's commenting...
by SideburnsOfDoom on Tuesday November 06, 2012 @09:49AM
(#4748575)
I'm not disagreeing with you; but the context is mostly about the use of XML.