That’s not how we started down this path. See snark-free sibling comment from padjo.

Both my claim and theirs are unsupported by evidence, therefore they are equally valid.

A third argument is that it was because of aliens from the planet Blotrox Prime. But I suppose without evidence we'll just have to accept that all three theories are equally probable.

Interesting how you decided to switch to hyperbole instead of providing evidence for your claim. Backing up your viewpoint would have easily shut me down, putting the ball in my court to do the same. Instead you gave a knee-jerk childish response.

Interesting that rather than try to bolster your claim you resorted to a logical fallacy to justify it.

Hypocritical; you did the same with the hyperbole. Why are you stooping to my level instead of being the better person?

Nope. Just a reductio as absurdum that you decided to counter by asking that I maintain higher standards of debate than you.

The notion that atomic architecture came about because people are stupid and performative is not really useful. Its fairly misanthropic and begs the question why it became so prevalent in JS specifically.

It's not just the name or the smart explanation.

Atomic packages brings more money to the creators.

If you have two useful packages it's hard to ask for money, even if they're used by Babel or some popular React dependency.

If you have 900 packages that are transitive dependencies the same couple deps above, it's way easier to get sponsorship. This is a way to advertise themselves: "I maintain 1000 packages".

The first guy that did this in a not-nice way was a marketing/salesperson and has mentioned that they did on purpose to launch their dev career.

TLDR: This is just some weird ass pyramid thing to get Github sponsors or clout.