News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by antisol on Saturday March 21, 2026 @05:47AM (#47465607)
Isn't it interesting how perspectives differ?

See, I'd argue that the "nobody is forcing you" rhetoric, spoken out loud and with a straight face while vendors drop support for decades-old, stable, and well-established standards in favour of immature, incompatible, broken new shininess, is an extremely dated argument strategy.

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by jrm4 on Saturday March 21, 2026 @09:08PM (#47473338)
Are we disagreeing? It sounds like we agree.
Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by antisol on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @10:38PM (#47512534)
No, we're not. Sorry, my bad.

It would seem I didn't read your post properly, I think I must have just been tired or something. I took "who is forced to use it" as a statement (i.e "I'm a user who is forced to use it") rather than a question. Reading it again now when I'm awake it makes a lot more sense!

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by jrm4 on Sunday March 29, 2026 @11:41AM (#47564111)
Hehe, I was confused like -- no yes this what I think too!