Re:We rewrote our Rust WASM Parser in TypeScript – and it go...
by apitman on Friday March 20, 2026 @10:06PM
(#47463341)
I don't think the better software part is playing out
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We rewrote our Rust WASM Parser in TypeScript – and it go...
by ch4s3 on Friday March 20, 2026 @10:33PM
(#47463473)
There’s a lot of really great software out there right now, and a lot that’s terrible and I think powerful abstractions enable both.
Re:We rewrote our Rust WASM Parser in TypeScript – and it go...
by remexre on Friday March 20, 2026 @10:36PM
(#47463484)
you're thinking of the programs in low-level langs that survived their higher-level-lang competitors; if you plot the programs on your machine by age, how does the low quartile compare on reliability between programs written in each group
Re:We rewrote our Rust WASM Parser in TypeScript – and it go...
by DaleBiagio on Monday March 23, 2026 @03:43PM
(#47494199)
Survivorship bias is exactly right.
The C and assembly programs we still use are the ones that were good enough to last. The thousands that weren't are gone.
Nobody counts the programs that were never finished because the language made them too hard to write in the first place.