What caused the switch? Also, are you still trying to use Claude models in OpenCode?

You can access anthropic models with subscription pricing via a copilot license.

Pretty sure that's against TOS.

Edit: it's not. https://github.blog/changelog/2026-01-16-github-copilot-now-...

They must be eating insane amounts of $$$ for this. I wouldn't expect it to last

No, Claude on GitHub Copilot is billed at 3X the usage rate of the other models e.g. GPT-5.4 and you get an extremely truncated context window.

See https://models.dev for a comparison against the normal "vanilla" API.

Yes I regularly plan in Opus 4.6 and execute in “lesser” models ie MiniMax

Sorry, I missed part of your question:

What caused the switch was that we're building AI solutions for sometimes price-conscious customers, so I was already familiar with the pattern of "Use a superior model for setting a standard, then fine-tuning a cheaper one to do that same work".

So I brought that into my own workflows (kind of) by using Opus 4.6 to do detailed planning and one 'exemplar' execution (with 'over documentation' of the choices), then after that, use Opus 4.6 only for planning, then "throw a load of MiniMax M2.5s at the problem".

They tend to do 90% of the job well, then I sometimes do a final pass with Opus 4.6 again to mop up any issues, this saves me a lot of tokens/money.

This pattern wasn't possible with Claude Code, thus my move to Open Code.