News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by happymellon on Friday March 20, 2026 @01:38AM (#47450890)
If you don't know what's going on, why comment?

A guy decided that after getting all his patches rejected because they cause tests to fail, doesn't compile, etc. that the problem is everyone else and decided to fork XOrg.

He then announced that the problem wasn't his code that didn't compile but DEI so based the entire forking around being a political conservative.

Everything I've seen written by him shows him to be insufferable, thats where the negative attention comes from.

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by Ferret7446 on Friday March 20, 2026 @02:19AM (#47451133)
There are a lot of distros that have xlibre packages for something that ostensibly doesn't compile.

I wouldn't trust the reason given by the people who have said that they're trying to kill Xorg for why they're rejecting patches from someone trying to improve Xorg

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by happymellon on Friday March 20, 2026 @02:33AM (#47451209)
> There are a lot of distros that have xlibre packages for something that ostensibly doesn't compile.

No one says xlibre doesn't compile, but good attempt at a distraction. Have you considered invading a country as an alternative way to distract from terrible views?

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by yjftsjthsd-h on Friday March 20, 2026 @02:54AM (#47451324)
> No one says xlibre doesn't compile

>> A guy decided that after getting all his patches rejected because they cause tests to fail, doesn't compile, etc. that the problem is everyone else and decided to fork XOrg.

Emphasis mine, words yours.

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by happymellon on Friday March 20, 2026 @04:24AM (#47451914)
Yeah, some submitted patches failed to compile. Others compiled and failed tests.

Not the same as XLibre doesn't compile.

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by yehat on Friday March 20, 2026 @03:00AM (#47451357)
Wow here it shows who's politically motivated and like it or not Xlibre probably felt the same way. Some people cannot sleep or chill if it is not theirs world view.
Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by DonHopkins on Friday March 20, 2026 @04:18AM (#47451877)
"... generic human experiment ... creates a new humanoid race ... toxic spike protein ..." - Enrico Weigelt on LKML

"... insane and technically incorrect ... idiotic lies ... you don't know what you are talking about ... SHUT THE HELL UP ..." - Linus Torvalds

https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/10/957

It's not just his code.

The COVID conspiracy theories Enrico Weigelt pushes are riddled with bugs, logical errors, and security holes, and don't compile or pass tests either.

Linus already reviewed both the code and the reasoning, and rejected them for failing basic correctness.

Re:Wayland set the Linux Desktop back by 10 years? by 2colours on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @11:14AM (#47518471)
This is indeed not at all about his code. I don't care what he thinks of vaccines and COVID - I just as much don't care what Linus Torvalds thinks about these things. They are damn programmers. Their business is to ship reliable, usable, secure software.