News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Embrace the Static Web with Punch by unoti on Sunday November 04, 2012 @02:08PM (#4740629)
A static site on s3 or similar is essentially infinitely scalable: you never have to worry about whether it can stand up to some publicity and its performance will always be snappy no matter what. It's cheap. It's controlled in source control and backed up. Achieving those same things using other configurations instead of static files takes an order of magnitude more work and complexity.
Re:Embrace the Static Web with Punch by zerostar07 on Sunday November 04, 2012 @02:25PM (#4740682)
Fair, but most programmers blogs have very little traffic
Re:Embrace the Static Web with Punch by cstejerean on Sunday November 04, 2012 @04:19PM (#4741098)
Until you write a post that ends up on the front page of HN and it brings your server down. The chances of that happening are small, so it's probably not worth optimizing a dynamic site for that use case, but with a static site you don't have to do any additional work or introduce complexity.