News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by foxwell_1959 on Monday March 16, 2026 @03:44PM (#47403834)
Thats 386,2 gram for the rest of the world.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by s1mon on Monday March 16, 2026 @04:49PM (#47404679)
Might as well be 3862 grams considering how much they hurt to wear for any length of time. I was also hoping this update would improve the ergonomics, but no. Still too heavy and no mention of any improvements to the headband.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by vessenes on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:27PM (#47406485)
I had the same reaction to the originals. They just hurt! One of my kids swiped them and I never used them again: I wanted to like them but they were almost as uncomfortable as my Vision Pro
Re:AirPods Max 2 by joemi on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:34PM (#47406545)
I think you'd find quite a difference between 386,2 g and 3862 g, especially when wearing it on your head.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by s1mon on Monday March 16, 2026 @09:34PM (#47407527)
Yes. Sarcasm.

I have a pair of the first generation AirPods Max. They leave dents in my scalp if I wear them for any real amount of time. I've been an Apple person since the 1980s. This is one of the most disappointing Apple products for me ever, and I really don't want to know how much $$$$$ lifetime customer value I've contributed to Apple's bottom line.

Re:AirPods Max 2 by rpgbr on Monday March 16, 2026 @05:25PM (#47405119)
3,86 kilograms, as the rest of the world says.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by joemi on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:35PM (#47406560)
You're too high by a power of 10.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by rpgbr on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @05:58AM (#47410573)
oh, you're right. Sorry about that. (Can't edit my comment.)
Re:AirPods Max 2 by orf on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:35PM (#47406563)
No it’s not?
Re:AirPods Max 2 by basilikum on Monday March 16, 2026 @09:54PM (#47407639)
On a planet with 10g gravity.
Re:AirPods Max 2 by billforsternz on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @12:05AM (#47408471)
386 grams, the extra 0.2 grams is not only irrelevant it's non existent because the process of converting from one measurement standard to another never increases the precision of the measurement.

Using 3 digits of precision also avoids being temped to use the rather niche ,2 convention when claiming to embrace a region as large as the rest of the world.

Re:AirPods Max 2 by sashagim on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @01:17AM (#47408936)
Interesting notion, but how do you know it's 13.6 and not 13.600?
Re:AirPods Max 2 by billforsternz on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @02:47AM (#47409426)
By convention if it was 13.600 they would present it as 13.600 not 13.6. If I remember correctly Everest was first surveyed as 29000 feet tall and they changed it arbitrarily to 29002 to avoid the apparent imprecision!
Re:AirPods Max 2 by zarzavat on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @06:24AM (#47410757)
Comma as decimal separator is actually the most common format, by number of countries, though dot still wins by population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_separator#/media/File:...