News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Theory of the World as run by large adult children by snowwrestler on Sunday March 15, 2026 @12:05PM (#47388729)
Genetic heritability, which is a subset of heritability, does not generally mean what people think it means, though. To the extent IQ can be attributed genetically to parents, it does not imply a "compounding" effect where smart people continuously have smarter kids and dumb people have dumber kids. This can understood by analogy to other personal traits like eyesight, height, weight, hair color, etc. which vary within a range across generations with occasional unpredictable outliers. This is why folks who do test for intelligence, have to test each person individually and not just rely on bloodline tracking.
Re:A Theory of the World as run by large adult children by xyzzyz on Sunday March 15, 2026 @05:20PM (#47392061)
Yes, but since the heritability is high, the average IQ of the children will be close to the average IQ of the parents, despite the fact that it will tend to regress towards the mean.
Re:A Theory of the World as run by large adult children by snowwrestler on Monday March 16, 2026 @01:21AM (#47395437)
That’s not how genetics works. It’s not a simple averaging scheme.
Re:A Theory of the World as run by large adult children by xyzzyz on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:23AM (#47397572)
That’s exactly how it works in the standard additive model of heritability, and we have lots of empirical evidence that heritability of intelligence matches that model very well.