Many SWE-bench-Passing PRs would not be merged

Re:Many SWE-bench-Passing PRs would not be merged by cfcfcf on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @09:43PM (#47345218)

I agree, I think this is AI, especially based on 1 and 2. It's hard to put your finger on, and I don't know if we can know for sure. It reminds me of the writing style you see on LinkedIn i.e. seemingly optimised for engagement.

If they're not already, I wonder if LLMs will get better at disguising this (avoiding the tells, inserting mistakes etc.)

I also wonder if there comes a point where we as a culture imitate this style.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Many SWE-bench-Passing PRs would not be merged by jc-myths on Thursday March 12, 2026 @12:56AM (#47346640)

TBH, I don't like AI-generated content much too, X and many other platforms were also flooded with those, which I tend to ignore. I guess I also fall into the rabbit hole myself with the aid of AI nowadays.

[ Parent | on HN ]