I wonder what the people who cancelled their ChatGPT subscriptions and switched to Anthropic are thinking now.

All these providers are the same.

Anthropic objected to being used to build autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. They didn't obejct to being used to hit schools in Iran.

OpenAI didn't object to anything.

They're all bad, but some are worse than others.

who believe here that saying no is possible ?

I'm convinced that Claude is being used to run hype train on HN.

That's option A, option B is pure halo effect. I.e. Claude is so good that people misascribe positive attributes to Anthropic.

Otherwise it really is mind boggling to see people laud Dario's posts which are tone blind to Europeans at least.

I'm European and would like to know what you mean wrt to Europeans.

How much do you value Anthropic's stance that they want to contracttually block domestic mass surveillance of Americans?

Versus OpenAI's stance that they want to block domestic mass surveillance of Americans with monitoring in the loop.

Given you're not American and neither has any issues with mass surveillance anywhere else on the planet.

Or that Anthropic sees itself as similar to the US Department of War.

You're being downvoted, but if Anthropic is going to deploy Claude for decision making in target prosecution it is clearly a "Caesar's wife must be above suspicion" moment. Association with is guilt unless proven otherwise.

Good catch!