News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sarvam 105B, the first competitive Indian open source LLM by petesergeant on Saturday March 07, 2026 @06:50AM (#47286782)
Got to start somewhere.

I do think convincing world-class talent to live in Bangalore is likely to be a challenge though.

Re:Sarvam 105B, the first competitive Indian open source LLM by th234oi204234 on Saturday March 07, 2026 @08:13AM (#47287346)
Indians deep-down often aren't comfortable in the West given the subtle racism and general social-rejection (last year's anti-Indian hate on X remains fresh in memory).

BLR has of late become a sort of "refuge" of tech retunees (with horrible third-world government and infrastructure, though). And it shows - the Matryoshka Embeddings being used in Gemini on-device / embedded models, came out of Deepmind BLR.

Re:Sarvam 105B, the first competitive Indian open source LLM by petesergeant on Saturday March 07, 2026 @08:17AM (#47287374)
For sure, there’s no place like home, and people have families and networks they can’t take with them. Still, getting that Western passport is a draw, and there’s always Abu Dhabi if you want quite close to home and a decent biryani, but also want world-class infrastructure and high (although not quite US) wages
Re:Sarvam 105B, the first competitive Indian open source LLM by villgax on Saturday March 07, 2026 @07:15AM (#47286957)
Bigger issue here is why the government is involved with select companies for subsidizing compute. There’s no pre or post criterion to assess success, it should have just been an open market for people with money to purchase compute instead of 10 companies with no prior experience in making models of any kind.

Public funds should beget public datasets and training scripts to see how it is being aligned as well and not just pandering to a particular govt.

Re:Sarvam 105B, the first competitive Indian open source LLM by petesergeant on Saturday March 07, 2026 @08:11AM (#47287334)
> Bigger issue here is why the government is involved with select companies for subsidizing compute.

Government-choosing-winners has worked much better, in many such cases, than free-market absolutists would have you believe…