Re:Hardening Firefox with Anthropic's Red Team
by simonw on Friday March 06, 2026 @07:05PM
(#47282779)
There's so much superstition and outdated information out there that "try it yourself" really is good advice.
You can do that in conjunction with trying things other people report, but you'll learn more quickly from your own experiments. It's not like prompting a coding agent is expensive or time consuming, for the most part.
/security-review really is pretty good.
But your codebase is unique. Slop in one codebase is very dangerous in another.
Re:Hardening Firefox with Anthropic's Red Team
by LamaOfRuin on Saturday March 07, 2026 @09:26AM
(#47287926)
For those not aware, this is a specific feature available in Claude Code.
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-se...
Re:Hardening Firefox with Anthropic's Red Team
by Groxx on Saturday March 07, 2026 @04:35PM
(#47291681)
that's kinda what I was looking for tbh. I didn't know that was an option, and nothing in the thread (or article) seemed to imply it was.
I was mostly working off "well I could ask claude to look at my code for security problems, i.e. 'plz check for security holes kthx', but is that really going to be the best option?". if "yes", then it would kinda imply that all the customization and prompt-fiddling people do is useless, which seems rather unlikely. a premade tool is a reasonable starting point.
Surely people have found patterns that work reasonably well, and it's not "everyone is completely on their own"? I get that the scene is changing fast, but that's ridiculous.