Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by windowshopping on Friday March 06, 2026 @03:30PM
(#47280687)
I've been able to get something like 25 interviews in 2 months despite having long gaps on my resume and nothing especially impressive to my name. So I suspect you might be going about this wrong. I haven't gotten an offer yet, that's another story, but getting the interviews hasn't been hard. Applying in NYC/SF, senior-only.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by HarHarVeryFunny on Friday March 06, 2026 @05:32PM
(#47282015)
So what do you attribute your success in getting interviews to? What are you doing right, or better than other people?
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by windowshopping on Friday March 06, 2026 @06:23PM
(#47282434)
I honestly have no idea. The last place I worked is pretty well-known. Not big tech, but a recognizable name to most people. I send out a lot of applications: those 25 interviews are the result of 150 applications in the last two months or so. And then I have my linkedin set to be discoverable and looking for a job. Basically just fiddle with the options under Visibility and Data Privacy in the linkedin settings and a bunch of people start reaching out to you immediately. I also think I have a nicely formatted resume, really readable.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by HarHarVeryFunny on Friday March 06, 2026 @07:53PM
(#47283171)
So are the majority of these applications the result of recruiters finding you via LinkedIn, or have you been applying direct as well? What application path have most of the interviews come from?
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by windowshopping on Friday March 06, 2026 @08:50PM
(#47283572)
Both equally. I apply to a lot of stuff on BuiltIn, mostly.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by HarHarVeryFunny on Saturday March 07, 2026 @08:49AM
(#47287618)
Thanks!
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by ipnon on Friday March 06, 2026 @09:37PM
(#47283878)
In my experience anyone who went to Ivy+ or worked at Big N never has any problem getting a job.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by windowshopping on Friday March 06, 2026 @11:25PM
(#47284483)
I did not go to an Ivy, but I did go to a recognizable engineering school in the northeast (not MIT.)
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by AbstractH24 on Saturday March 07, 2026 @06:46AM
(#47286759)
So, NYU?
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by dijit on Saturday March 07, 2026 @04:27AM
(#47286006)
Location has always been a huge factor in these discussions. There are usually significantly less opportunities outside of hubs. It’s a cart/horse problem- because companies go to those hubs to hire due the talent pool.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by sidereal1 on Friday March 06, 2026 @05:55PM
(#47282232)
I think another big change is the offer rate. I've had plenty of interviews in recent years but almost no offers.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by uncivilized on Friday March 06, 2026 @06:12PM
(#47282353)
Senior level is doing the heavy lifting here.
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by pfannkuchen on Friday March 06, 2026 @09:46PM
(#47283936)
Isn’t the person with 14 years experience at least senior? Or are you saying senior is low level enough to get interviews?
Re:Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or ...
by uncivilized on Saturday March 07, 2026 @06:53AM
(#47286801)
Yes, I’m not speaking about the person with 14 years of experience.
I’m saying that looking for senior level roles is much easier than roles that aren’t quite senior yet.