News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Wikipedia in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise. Parent comment

Re:Wikipedia in read-only mode following mass admin account ... by streetfighter64 on Thursday March 05, 2026 @01:33PM (#47265358)
Look, I'm not defending wikipedia, I'd just like to point out that comparing hosting to salaries is a quite strange metric. Hosting is cheap and relatively constant, adding features to the site or paying admins to maintain the quality of edits is scalable. How does throwing more money at hosting make a better product? It's not like the servers can't handle the requests.

Using hosting costs as an index is nonsensical. I wasn't able to find numbers for 2009, but since 2015 the monthly page views have remained almost exactly constant. So you might as well claim that they're vastly overpaying for hosting since inflation from 2008 is way less than 3.75x.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia in read-only mode following mass admin account ... by kbolino on Thursday March 05, 2026 @01:52PM (#47265649)
I picked hosting because it's a line item that exists across all of their budgets, it's a rough proxy for a web business's non-salary expenses, it's a big part of what you think you're donating to based upon Wikipedia's own language in their fundraising drives, and if nothing else, it's way more forgiving to the growth of their expenses than consumer price inflation is.

Ultimately every person has to decide for themselves whether they think WMF is a worthy recipient for their donations, but it is in no way operating on a shoestring budget nor staffed by volunteers anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]