> Because "AGI" (Artificial General Intelligence) has no universally accepted definition, the term "Financial AGI" is defined here as a domain-specific standard that is measurable, auditable, and intentionally narrow.

So essentially, you’re redefining “general” as “specific”. Makes absolutely no sense.

This submission is an ad.

The idea is that its general across a massive domain (i.e. finance) and able to do the entire jobs of human financial experts (not just one part of their jobs). Don't you think that applies here?

No. I think it’s obvious this is an ad and that they’re trying to co-opt a term to make their product look more impressive to gullible investors and customers. It’s not even an original marketing tactic.