News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite. Parent comment

Re:Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite by jacquesm on Thursday March 05, 2026 @10:16AM (#47262525)
The point is that the AI's themselves and their backers are on the record as saying that the AI could reproduce copyrighted works in their entirety but that there are countermeasures in place to stop them from doing so.

I wonder what the results would be if I spent time to train a model up from scratch without any such constraints. But I'm much too busy with other stuff right now, but that would be an interesting challenge.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite by ndriscoll on Thursday March 05, 2026 @10:24AM (#47262656)
Yeah just like a star could appear inside of Earth from quantum pair production at any given moment. But realistically, it can't. And you can't even show a test where any model can get more than a few tokens in a row correct.

These companies just don't want to deal with people complaining that it reproduces something when they don't understand that they're literally giving it the answer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Relicensing with AI-Assisted Rewrite by jacquesm on Thursday March 05, 2026 @12:21PM (#47264428)
You do realize you are now arguing against your own case don't you?
[ Parent | on HN ]