News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Father claims Google's AI product fuelled son's delusiona... by ryandrake on Thursday March 05, 2026 @02:07AM (#47258506)
Do they kill over a million people a year worldwide? How many orders of magnitude fewer people are killed by E-things?

OP's point was that if you invented something today that killed over a million people per year, it probably wouldn't be allowed, and I don't think that's really that controversial a statement.

Re:Father claims Google's AI product fuelled son's delusiona... by bdangubic on Thursday March 05, 2026 @04:33AM (#47259589)
when the first cars started rolling down the streets they weren’t killing millions of people either
Re:Father claims Google's AI product fuelled son's delusiona... by roenxi on Friday March 06, 2026 @03:18AM (#47272367)
> Do they kill over a million people a year worldwide? How many orders of magnitude fewer people are killed by E-things?

On a per meter basis I'd expect bikes to be much worse. I've had more injuries on bike than in car, and people can certainly kill themselves on a bike. The main reason they don't is because the bad bike riders usually have enough accidents that they stop getting on the things. Bikes in themselves would probably be borderline illegal to sell if they were invented today, they don't look safe at all. And E-things are less safe again than ordinary bikes.

> OP's point was that if you invented something today that killed over a million people per year, it probably wouldn't be allowed, and I don't think that's really that controversial a statement.

I'm not replying to OP. I agree with him on this one and note that the implication of that is e-bikes are probably on their way towards being banned or restricted.