Skeuomorphism's Last Hope

Re:Skeuomorphism's Last Hope by nthitz on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @06:40PM (#4725265)

Hmmm, I have to disagree with the conclusion: "Either skeuomorphism is over and Jack Dorsey isn't the next Steve Jobs, or skeuomorphism isn't over and Jack Dorsey is the next Steve Jobs."

with the thought that it is possible skeuomorphism isn't over and Jack Dorsey is not the next Steve Jobs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Skeuomorphism's Last Hope by freyr on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @06:43PM (#4725269)

Seriously. Who wrote this, Jack Dorsey's mom?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Skeuomorphism's Last Hope by nkwiatek on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @06:47PM (#4725284)

Or, that whether or not you happen to like skeuomorphism is a necessary condition for being "the next Steve Jobs".

If the most important part of being Steve Jobs is making sure your app has leather in it, then you can witness the work of a few hundred-thousand "next Steve Jobs's" just by browsing the App Store.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Skeuomorphism's Last Hope by ArekDymalski on Thursday November 01, 2012 @03:36PM (#4729286)

Yep, haven't seen such horrible example of logical fallacy in a long time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Skeuomorphism's Last Hope by zenogais on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @06:46PM (#4725281)

Yeah, the end really sent it off a cliff for me as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]