News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court declines review). Parent comment

Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by freejazz on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @04:18PM (#47239167)
> human review or testing

Review and testing do not confer a copyright the work reviewed or tested

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by circuit10 on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @06:19PM (#47240520)
I guess I was thinking more when it involves rewriting large parts of it because they don't work
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by freejazz on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @07:28PM (#47241274)
That would be authorship, no?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI-generated art can't be copyrighted (Supreme Court decl... by circuit10 on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @04:13AM (#47244975)
It sounds like they might be under the impression that having any AI-generated output in the code even if parts are human authored would invalidate the copyright, which isn’t true
[ Parent | on HN ]