News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm losing the SEO battle for my own open source project by shevy-java on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @02:20PM (#47237421)
I agree that MIT may not be the best licence here in such a use case scenario. The question is why corporations think they can be leeches though - and the bigger, the more of a leech they are on the ecosystem. That's just not right.
Re:I'm losing the SEO battle for my own open source project by buran77 on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @03:28PM (#47238479)
> The question is why corporations think they can be leeches though

Because they can, they don't just think they do. Everything about the framework they operate in allows or even encourages them to do it.

> That's just not right.

As a matter of morality, you're right. This is something very few people or corporations concern themselves with just as soon as there's real money to be made by not concerning themselves with this.

Re:I'm losing the SEO battle for my own open source project by graemep on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @02:27PM (#47237543)
> The question is why corporations think they can be leeches though

because they can be. They do not think they can be leeches, they know they can be leeches.

> That's just not right

I somewhat agree with you, but they do actually have permission to do it.

Re:I'm losing the SEO battle for my own open source project by jonathanstrange on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @03:03PM (#47238111)
IMHO, this is the wrong way of looking at it. You can choose any license you like. Choose the right license, and that should be the end of the discussion.
Re:I'm losing the SEO battle for my own open source project by duskdozer on Thursday March 05, 2026 @12:50AM (#47258010)
Because the copyright owners give them explicit approval to leech by using those licenses.