Google loses Australia 'gangland' defamation lawsuit

Re:Google loses Australia 'gangland' defamation lawsuit by incision on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @10:14AM (#4722887)

Looks to me like Yahoo's lawyers set a precedent by previously agreeing to equate linking to "publishing" and paid this clown off to the tune of $250K.

Now the clown and his lawyers are capitalizing on that judgement to collect another check.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google loses Australia 'gangland' defamation lawsuit by _seininn on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @11:50AM (#4723393)

It's clear from your comment that you are against the ruling and the man's actions, but calling him "clown" doesn't add anything and, in some cases, takes away from any point you're trying to make.

If you have a point to make, I'm sure you can make it without name calling.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google loses Australia 'gangland' defamation lawsuit by bduerst on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @02:52PM (#4724447)

You're making an ad-hom attack for making ad-hom attacks?

[ Parent | on HN ]