News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Haskell in Production: The good, the bad, and the ugly by merijnv on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @09:47AM (#4722764)
What do you mean by bandaging the standard? And why are extensions scary?

In general none of the extensions change the behaviour of valid "standard haskell" (beyond adding a small handfull of new keywords, rendering those words illegal as variable names). So calling it "bandaging the standard" seems a bit harsh/odd.

I think extensions are a nice way of keeping the language moving forward without being slowed down by the standardisation process. The standard can then catch up in its own time.

Re:Haskell in Production: The good, the bad, and the ugly by Argorak on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @11:48AM (#4723381)
Because there is no better way of saying "this is not finished yet and might be removed at any time".