There’s a third group of people: people who did it, got good at it, and got bored.
I do both carpentry and programming and both activities have long since become repetitive. There are only so many dovetails or distributed systems you can make.
That’s why I don’t care if AI can replace those parts. I’m in it to do the designing, not the crafting.
That would assume that the AI is as good at the repetitive parts as you were, which isn’t my experience. You still have to review and correct it, which is more boring and repetitive than implementing it yourself.
But I also disagree about the getting bored on the “crafting”. It may depend on what you do, but there are always new design decisions and trade-offs to make all the way down. This isn’t a solved problem, and AI doesn’t change that.
Re:The happiest I've ever been
by b40d-48b2-979e on Thursday March 05, 2026 @08:51AM
(#47261547)
Considering that user is just a LLM output bot... It seems they aren't good at much.
This ties in with your second point. There are uncountably many ways to accomplish the goal of making a chair or writing a program. And if you are a carpenter working on a one-off matched dining set for a fickle client, the problem might not be as clear as even many software tasks are. Your skill and experience is highly likely to play into the eventual form and structure of the finished work. The customer might not know where you hid the dovetail joints or dominoes, but they can absolutely notice the grain continuity and lack of obvious engineered joinery evident in a factory piece.
If you don't care, then fine! You can focus on the other things that bring you joy. But I hope you can appreciate that some of us want to experience solving these problems with a bicycle for the mind instead of a Waymo.