Re:Obsidian Sync now has a headless client
by hombre_fatal on Saturday February 28, 2026 @01:50PM
(#47198841)
I was using SyncThing, and it worked, but any time you have an Obsidian vault open on two devices, or shortly after another, you're always thinking about if you're going to have to clean up a bunch of sync conflict files later. And that mental overhead is not worth saving $4/mo.
The conflicts are never hard: it's like a git merge conflict where you just take the latest of every conflict block.
Re:Obsidian Sync now has a headless client
by batisteo on Sunday March 01, 2026 @04:22AM
(#47205098)
For me using SyncThing totally worth it, but I guess it's down to our income difference
Re:Obsidian Sync now has a headless client
by EchoReflection on Sunday March 01, 2026 @10:58AM
(#47207862)
I used multiple sync "solutions" (terrible idea, in retrospect); Dropsync, Syncthing, Drivesync, in addition to paying for Obsidian Sync, because I was delusional about "backing up my data". Huge mistake on my part, I've spent many, many, many hours deduplicating worthless "backups". Agree with "just pay for Obsidian Sync".
Mirrors my experience.
Re:Obsidian Sync now has a headless client
by sudhirkhanger on Sunday March 01, 2026 @12:54PM
(#47208981)
What tool can be used to resolve syncthing conflicts? I get a lot of.stversion files.
Re:Obsidian Sync now has a headless client
by haltcatchfire on Sunday March 01, 2026 @04:00AM
(#47204991)
I try to selfhost most of my stuff I rely on. Immich, Vaultwarden, etc. I gave up on trying to selfhost sync solutions for Obsidian - Obsidian Sync is just so damn frictionless compared to all other solutions. Also, it feels good supporting the development of Obsidian.
Its one of the few subscriptions where it actually feels like money well spent