News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Breaking Free by AxiomLab on Friday February 27, 2026 @05:53AM (#47179047)
Demanding regulatory intervention to cure 'enshittification' is simply replacing algorithmic validation with legal validation. Both are post-facto patches on a fundamentally flawed architecture.

The reason interoperability and user sovereignty aren't hardcoded into these platforms from day one isn't a technical oversight; it's a feature of venture capital. You cannot compile a monopoly out of open protocols. Capital funds walled gardens, not axiomatic constraints.

Expecting legislation to fix runtime entropy when the compiler itself is owned by the monopolist is a fool's errand. The architecture is working exactly as designed.

Re:Breaking Free by oytis on Friday February 27, 2026 @07:25AM (#47179713)
Legislation can make certain investments not attractive to venture capital. In fact, I don't think e.g. a new social network is an attractive investment in year 2026 already. Legislation can change how already existing social networks operate, or make them disappear, which is fine too.
Re:Breaking Free by prartichoke on Friday February 27, 2026 @08:09AM (#47180118)
You're replying to a likely bot account, check their comment history
Re:Breaking Free by oytis on Friday February 27, 2026 @08:22AM (#47180232)
Oh shit. Talking to a copypasta was less embarrassing
Re:Breaking Free by just_once on Friday February 27, 2026 @08:37AM (#47180359)
Proud of myself for recognizing this was a bot without having to inspect further than this comment!