News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mvkel on Thursday February 26, 2026 @06:13PM (#47173534)
These are literally words. The DoW could still easily exploit these platforms, and nothing Anthropic has done can prevent it, other than saying (publicly), "we disagree."
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by layer8 on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:11PM (#47174310)
The dispute seems to be specifically about safeguards that Anthropic has in its models and/or harnesses, that the DoD wants removed, which Anthropic refuses to do, and won’t sign a contract requiring their removal. Having implemented the safeguards and refusing their removal are actions, not “literally words”.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mvkel on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:08PM (#47174927)
The "safeguards" you are referring to are contractual, i.e. words. There are no technical safeguards, per the article.

The memo literally says that the reason they have these policies is -because- actual technical guardrails are not reliable enough.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by layer8 on Friday February 27, 2026 @07:41AM (#47179856)
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mvkel on Friday February 27, 2026 @04:33PM (#47185935)
Again, these are just words, and they're a salad of legal terms of art that provide cover for virtually any action. "We prevent the -illegitimate- use..." [define illegitimate plz?]

In your second link, that team was defunded; the person heading it just left ceremoniously: https://x.com/mrinanksharma/status/2020881722003583421?s=46

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by janalsncm on Thursday February 26, 2026 @06:22PM (#47173667)
It’s a contract dispute. Contracts are more than just talk.

While it is true that DoW could try to bypass the contract and do whatever they want, if it were that easy they wouldn’t be asking for a contract in the first place.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mvkel on Thursday February 26, 2026 @06:51PM (#47174086)
Should probably look up how many private companies are suing the government at any one time because of a breach of contract. And that's publicly breaching.

NSA and other three-letter agencies happily do it under cloak and dagger.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by janalsncm on Thursday February 26, 2026 @11:02PM (#47176342)
I agree with you that the govt can and does violate contracts. So the fact that they need Anthropic to agree signals that it’s more than just lawyers preventing the DoW from doing whatever they want.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mhitza on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:40PM (#47174646)
What's the US history around nationalization? Would "confiscation", ever be a likelyhood on escalation?

On a quick search I came up with an article, that at least thematically, proposes such ideas about the current administration "Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook"

https://thefulcrum.us/trump-state-control-capitalism