Re:Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid
by mbgerring on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @07:21PM
(#47160098)
No, it's the US dollars circulating globally because all transactions for oil anywhere in the world are dollar-denominated, giving the US control over the entire global financial system.
Re:Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid
by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @08:03PM
(#47160419)
> because all transactions for oil anywhere in the world are dollar-denominated
This was sort of true in the 1970s only because we ignored the Soviet Union and its allies, which included a lot of petroleum production. It's totally untrue now, in a world where America exports oil. (I traded contracts in Connecticut in the early 2010s. Oil was priced in all sorts of currencies. British and Norwegian oil, for example, is sold for local currency.)
Re:Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid
by samrus on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @10:17PM
(#47161376)
What about iranian or russian oil? Can british and norweigian buy iranian oil in currency other than dollars?
Re:Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday February 26, 2026 @06:31AM
(#47164631)
> Can british and norweigian buy iranian oil in currency other than dollars?
Both Russia and Iran are heavily sanctioned by the U.S. Neither sells its oil for dollars by default, though either will accept them, of course.
Note, too, that pricing and settlement are different. If I’m Russia selling oil to India, I can “sell” at $50/barrel and accept payment in rupees or rubles. (Indian refineries were not paying Russia dollars for oil.)
Re:Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid
by pjc50 on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:45AM
(#47165312)
Thankyou for pointing this out. People get very weird about how the petrodollar works, it's more about convenience than force. Like the "eurodollar" of financial clearing. In general people overlook how much America (and to a lesser extent the UK) export "stability as a service". Which becomes jeopardized if the leader is unstable.
The 'export' that made the US powerful was finance and political manipulation - toppling socialist / populist leaders to install puppets and controlling economies by manipulating trade.
I think your original point kind of stands, though - we are seeing a decline and independence from our supply chain is going to be a deciding factor in 'who's the next top dog', but I think the decline is going to be a lot uglier than a simple "they have it now and we don't" - it's going to be all the thrashing about that an aggressive international power does when the grift no longer works.