News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Infinite Gangnam Style by stianan on Sunday October 28, 2012 @09:50PM (#4710708)
Your build up progression is exactly the same as mine, only I interpret it as based on the major key III. I agree we're not talking about modulation in the usual sense, but I think it makes sense to think of it as a key change. It reminds my ears of the common IV-V-vi progression, only with a suprising major VI.
Re:Infinite Gangnam Style by cynicalkane on Sunday October 28, 2012 @09:55PM (#4710714)
I have to disagree again... I don't think a III chord is anywhere in the entire song. The build up is in the parallel major.
Re:Infinite Gangnam Style by stianan on Sunday October 28, 2012 @10:05PM (#4710741)
Right, the key III is the parallel major. I'm shifting the base of the notation for this passage. When I say III ends the build up, I mean III in the parallel major key, i.e. V(7) in the original key.
Re:Infinite Gangnam Style by cynicalkane on Sunday October 28, 2012 @10:17PM (#4710769)
III is the relative major. I is the parallel major. As I said, I believe there is no III anywhere in the song.
Re:Infinite Gangnam Style by stianan on Sunday October 28, 2012 @10:27PM (#4710796)
You're absolutely right. In my native language, the relative key is called the parallel key. Sorry for causing confusion.

So, to clarify, I'm not claiming there is a III in the original key, I'm referring to the III chord of the relative major key.