So what should the penalty be?
> The base assumption is slavery is wrong.
Do you disagree that slavery is wrong?
You continue to dodge my question about the alternative to incarceration, when we continue to have significant numbers of repeat offenders. You know what I’m asking, yet continue to try and distract from it by nitpicking semantics. I don’t think you have an answer.
There are plenty of reasons. Mass incarcertaion is a strategy, and it's unique to the US.
If you're really curious, a good entry point is the film "13th".
As a third person observing this conversation, you seem neither curious nor interested in learning why someone might think of US mass incarceration in such strong terms.
The answers are out there, if you actually cared to find them.
When did I say there should be no penalty for crime? When did I say there should be no penalty for a career of crime?
> What is your solution to prevent crime without incarceration
When did I say we should eliminate incarceration?
You're putting words in my mouth. You're creating a strawman.
What does crime mean to you?
What does crime look like?
What sorts of people commit crimes? Why do they commit crimes? What crimes do they commit?