News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about "Claws" by CuriouslyC on Saturday February 21, 2026 @08:58AM (#47100910)
The parent's model is right. You can mitigate a great deal with a basic zero trust architecture. Agents don't have direct secret access, and any agent that accesses untrusted data is itself treated as untrusted. You can define a communication protocol between agents that fails when the communicating agent has been prompt injected, as a canary.

More on this technique at https://sibylline.dev/articles/2026-02-15-agentic-security/

Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about "Claws" by what on Sunday February 22, 2026 @12:24AM (#47108457)
>You can define a communication protocol between agents that fails when the communicating agent has been prompt injected

Good luck with that.

Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about "Claws" by aix1 on Sunday February 22, 2026 @01:23AM (#47108728)
Yeah, how exactly would that work?
Re:Andrej Karpathy talks about "Claws" by CuriouslyC on Sunday February 22, 2026 @08:50AM (#47110990)
A schema with response metadata (so responses that deviate from it fail automatically), plus a challenge question that's calibrated to be hard enough that the disruption of instruction following from prompt injection can cause the model to answer incorrectly.