Re:Anonymous Is Going After Zynga For Mistreating Employees
by Alex_r on Sunday October 28, 2012 @06:10PM
(#4710156)
As a hardcore/indie gamer myself, I understand that a lot of hardcore gamers are turned away by Zynga.
But I'm not Zynga's target audience, and that's okay. And there's a lot of sympathy for your point about the "spaminess."
However, going from spammy/over-monetizing to evil has always seemed a tad dramatic to me.
Re:Anonymous Is Going After Zynga For Mistreating Employees
by krickle on Sunday October 28, 2012 @09:13PM
(#4710595)
The games are designed to both get people addicted, and to get your friends involved by manipulating social gift reciprocity obligations. I think we'd have settled for "awful" up until the clawbacks, now we know the leadership at Zynga is sociopathic at best. Maybe not evil, but totally unscrupulous, totally unsympathetic.
Re:Anonymous Is Going After Zynga For Mistreating Employees
by jlgreco on Sunday October 28, 2012 @09:10PM
(#4710587)
I think the leap from "spamminess" to "evil" is helped by those other two things he pointed out.
Re:Anonymous Is Going After Zynga For Mistreating Employees
by motoford on Monday October 29, 2012 @08:51AM
(#4711995)
I think the reasons you list are why people really dislike Zynga, but those things alone are not enough to explain the pure hate people have for the company.
The reason I think they are evil is the way they treat their employees, beginning with forcing developers to give back stock before their IPO. This latest stunt is just piling on.
I think when people say Zynga is evil, they largely point to three things:
* spaminess of the games
* propensity to copy other products rather than come up with original ideas
* tuning of games to maximize revenues from individual players
Do you think these are fair judgments about Zynga's methods? Is Zynga more guilty of these tendencies than other gaming companies?