News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by vkou on Friday February 20, 2026 @05:11PM (#47094746)
That's the case in any country where a parliamentary body is split so closely.

When you need every vote to get legislature to pass, because you control 51% of a chamber, backbenchers on the ideological fringe of a party, (DINOs and RINOs) have a lot of power.

When you have a majority with comfortable margins, you can care a lot less about what the Sinemas and Manchins and McCains of a party think.

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by philistine on Friday February 20, 2026 @07:50PM (#47096209)
You're looking at the world with your American blinders on. The rest of the world's elected representatives vote with their party or they leave their party. What you're describing is a fundamentally American phenomenon.
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by 0xDEAFBEAD on Saturday February 21, 2026 @03:38AM (#47098735)
But parties typically have to compromise with other parties in their coalition, so it would seem to amount to the same thing (compromise is required to pass legislation)?
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by vkou on Saturday February 21, 2026 @05:21AM (#47099341)
Correct. The difference between FPTP and PR systems (Or countries with very strong regional parties) is that in a multi-party PR system, the coalition happens between party, in a FPTP two-party system, the coalition happens within the big tentpole parties.

There are many reasons for why two-party FPTP sucks, but this phenomena is present in multi-party systems, too. And, of course, sometimes politicians end up crossing the aisle, much to the chagrin of the party whip.