> and debate is a means to pursue an agenda

Scount mindset: the discovery of the truth to the best of our ability without fear or favour.

The metaphor is: A scout who tells the general his troops are strong when they are weak, that the enemy is weak when it is strong, is a bad scout.

The opposite is a soldier mindset: a soldier who fears to fight when ordered, no matter the strength of the enemy, isn't a good soldier.

You can call the search for truth an agenda in its own right if you wish, but it lacks the "primarily used to influence or persuade" aspect of propaganda.

>Scount mindset: the discovery of the truth to the best of our ability without fear or favour.

That's a mind-slave mindset. Why is the scout working for the general and not for himself?

Why do you see the negative in everything, even metaphors? There's no slavery here. There's not even "slavery" even in actual scouts working for actual generals.

And a general needs the same *mindset*, even if they must also engage in performative ho-rah-ing to the troops.

A general may need to order their troops to die for the greater good, they may need to lie to the troops to up morale, but if a general lets themselves believe they're strong when they're weak, they're bad at being generals. If they don't listen to their scouts, if they shoot the messenger, they're bad at being generals.