News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by skrtskrt on Thursday February 19, 2026 @02:27PM (#47077976)
> The magnitude of the investment also probably makes it impractical for anyone but the very wealthy to retire before that starts paying out...

But they can pull out for housing right? That's an enormous portion of most people's expenses. If I didn't have to worry about housing, I could be living large on less than half of my salary, I would certainly semi-retire at least.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by everforward on Thursday February 19, 2026 @03:06PM (#47078482)
Sort of. So far as I can tell, you can withdraw to buy housing but I don’t think you can pay rent out of it.

The loans are also 75% max loan-to-value so I think until you can get 25% of the purchase price in your account you have to pay CPF and rent (or live with family).

Also, not an economist, but I suspect the forced savings has a wildly inflationary effect on housing prices. You can’t do much else with the money until you retire, so I would guess the price of housing rises up to match the forced savings rate.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by delta_p_delta_x on Thursday February 19, 2026 @06:46PM (#47081510)
> the forced savings has a wildly inflationary effect on housing prices

Housing prices are inflationary independent of CPF, because flats in Singapore are powerful investment vehicles. For HDB flats, however, there is means-testing and rebates to the amount of ~50%, sufficient for anyone on the 30th percentile and above to afford.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by refurb on Thursday February 19, 2026 @10:09PM (#47083188)
Since the government controls the supplies of HDBs, it controls the price inflation.

So it would be more accurate to say “housing prices are inflationary because the government wants them to be”.

Yet this introduces a ton of new problems as well. In order to keep them “good investments” it becomes ever increasing prices with ever increasing rebates to help lower income afford them.

But eventually prices will stop going up.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by com2kid on Friday February 20, 2026 @12:29AM (#47084158)
All housing stock is controlled by governments everywhere through zoning.

American cities could solve their housing shortages in short order but it'd piss off too many people who are "invested' in housing so we accept dead bodies in our streets and social instability instead.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by everforward on Saturday February 21, 2026 @09:48AM (#47101329)
> American cities could solve their housing shortages in short order but it'd piss off too many people who are "invested' in housing so we accept dead bodies in our streets and social instability instead.

I agree with you about fixing the housing market, but I think you underestimate the instability caused by changing housing prices rapidly.

If housing prices drop by something like 25%, a lot of people are going to be upside down on their loans (outstanding principal exceeds the value of the asset). The banks now have mortgages that aren’t fully secured anymore, and borrowers are heavily incentivized to allow a foreclosure unless they’ve paid down the principal by a lot.

We’re talking the 08 recession all over again.

Re:America vs. Singapore: You Can't Save Your Way Out of Eco... by accurrent on Thursday February 19, 2026 @07:29PM (#47081971)
Very few locals pays rent here. Most people buy houses. Its kindof forced thanks to the system, but its designed in a way that unless you are a decimillionaire housing is expensive, but attainable. This is done by splitting the housing market into private and public housing. Is this perfect? No.

And yes it does drive inflation of house prices.