News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Martial arts robots dazzle at 2026 Spring Festival Gala [... by Joel_Mckay on Thursday February 19, 2026 @04:38AM (#47071879)
Smaller platforms are actually harder to build: minimal power budget, weaker drive systems, less sensors, and fewer processing options.

Not a fan of bipedal platforms or 50kg of servos for a number of reasons.

Best regards. =3

Re:Martial arts robots dazzle at 2026 Spring Festival Gala [... by michaelt on Thursday February 19, 2026 @06:03AM (#47072498)
Yes and no.

An Aldebaran Nao can fall over with no damage because it’s only 5kg and 58cm. And you can use relatively low power motors, so nobody can lose a finger to crushing in the joints.

But you miss out on the benefits of being able to operate in a human centric world - you’ll never get a Nao to climb stairs, open a door, or carry a cup of coffee.

Re:Martial arts robots dazzle at 2026 Spring Festival Gala [... by Joel_Mckay on Friday February 20, 2026 @12:13AM (#47084042)
>Nao can fall over with no damage

They were overpriced, hard to repair, and the university lab would lose one every few weeks. The consumer grade internal ribbon PCB interconnect harness would usually tear eventually.

Those 3kW to 5kW brush-less servos in the biped dance video are often only 12:1 planetary reduction, and are almost certainly backdrivable. As long as the platform has a safe-fall canned pose, than damage should be limited to shear pins in the worst case falls.

Fun to see people pushing the design limits. =3