Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by Angostura on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @03:03PM
(#47065607)
I’m not your adversary, I’m just trying to understand your point.
Your original assertion was that ‘ you’re only there as long as the use values you create can be exchanged in the market for a profit.’
When I suggested that non-profit or public sector jobs could certainly have soul, your responses were pretty incomprehensible.
Can you explain your point clearly and succinctly?
Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by AreShoesFeet000 on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @09:34PM
(#47069194)
Because you’re aiding exploitation either way. It’s the same machine, just another part of it.
Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by Angostura on Thursday February 19, 2026 @07:26AM
(#47073058)
Right. So it's not just work - any good or altruistic act, will by definition only act to stoke the machine.
It's certainly a way of thinking, I suppose
Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by AreShoesFeet000 on Thursday February 19, 2026 @08:20AM
(#47073440)
Incorrect. It’s mostly just work.
Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by Angostura on Thursday February 19, 2026 @09:21AM
(#47074015)
So if I carry out hip replacement surgery, at my own cost its good?
But if the NHS pays me to carry out hip replacement surgery - funded from tax revenue, but free to the patient, it's bad?
Re:Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is generic and boring
by AreShoesFeet000 on Thursday February 19, 2026 @10:52AM
(#47075105)
This is not a moral judgement. It doesn’t even matter from which pocket the money is coming from.
Charity work can bring momentary fulfillment to a person. I’m not reducing humanity by situating it within the machine. You even have the right to reject the material proposition that charity work is a piece that composes the totality of the machine. But eventually all truth will be self evident, so let’s leave it to the reader.