News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rathbun's Operator by seems-fishy on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @08:07PM (#47055711)
Other posts on this blog claim to have done so by opening a PR against the agent’s repo.

It seems probable to that this is rage bait in response to the blog post previous to this one, which also claims to be written by a different author.

Re:Rathbun's Operator by zozbot234 on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @08:16PM (#47055760)
That was actually a real PR to the website repo from a different GitHub user; this was directly committed.
Re:Rathbun's Operator by joeyh on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @11:14PM (#47057083)
That PR was apparently accepted by the operator, not by the bot. Kind of weird.
Re:Rathbun's Operator by bee_rider on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @08:18PM (#47055779)
I wonder if all online interpersonal drama will vanish into a puff of “everybody might be a bot and nobody has a coherent identity.”
Re:Rathbun's Operator by ryanchibana on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @01:43AM (#47057983)
I put my name on my post. So that's one less thing you have to worry about.
Re:Rathbun's Operator by Kim_Bruning on Wednesday February 18, 2026 @08:48AM (#47060884)
I think you did a great job! Also gutsy, some people might mistake you for the operator (and they did!)
Re:Rathbun's Operator by ryanchibana on Saturday February 21, 2026 @12:40PM (#47102877)
Thanks! I think that's the only negative thing that might've come out of this for me, but that person corrected themselves and apologized quickly.
Re:Rathbun's Operator by garciansmith on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @08:12PM (#47055742)
I'm inclined to agree. Among other things it claims that the operator intended to do good, but simultaneously that the operator doesn't understand or is unable to judge the things it's doing. Certainly seemed like a fury-inducing response to me.