Re:Tesla 'Robotaxi' adds 5 more crashes in Austin in a month...
by BoredPositron on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @02:47PM
(#47052217)
Just because someone tells you to produce child pornography you don't have to do it just because you are able to. Other model providers don't have the problem...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla 'Robotaxi' adds 5 more crashes in Austin in a month...
by parl_match on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @03:02PM
(#47052482)
that is an ethical and business problem, not entirely a legal problem (currently). hopefully, it will universally be a legal problem in the near future, though.
and frankly, anyone paying grok (regardless of their use of it) is contributing to the problem
Re:Tesla 'Robotaxi' adds 5 more crashes in Austin in a month...
by BoredPositron on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @03:21PM
(#47052764)
It's only an ethics and business problem if the produced images are purely synthetic and in most jurisdictions even that is questionable. Grok produced child pornography of real children which is a legal problem.
Re:Tesla 'Robotaxi' adds 5 more crashes in Austin in a month...
by philistine on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @04:47PM
(#47053882)
It is not ethical to wait for legal solutions and in the meantime just producing fake child pornography with your AI solution.
Legal things are amoral, amoral things are legal. We have a duty to live morally, legal is only words in books.
Re:Tesla 'Robotaxi' adds 5 more crashes in Austin in a month...
by bluGill on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @05:15PM
(#47054182)
I live morally. I assume you do - the vast vast majority of reading this comment will not ask AI to produce child porn. However a small minority will, which is why we have laws and police.