> The way that we address human fallibility is to create a system that does not accept the input of a single human as "truth".
I think you just rejected all user requirement and design specs.
Re:Breaking the Spell of Vibe Coding
by buzzerbetrayed on Sunday February 15, 2026 @12:29PM
(#47025546)
Not sure how things work at your company, but I’ve never seen a design spec that doesn’t have input from many humans on some form or another
Your claim here is that humans can't hallucinate something random. Clearly they can and do.
> ... that will logic through things and find the correct answer.
But humans do not find the correct answer 100% of the time.
The way that we address human fallibility is to create a system that does not accept the input of a single human as "truth". Even these systems only achieve "very high probability" but not 100% correctness. We can employ these same systems with AI.