News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by ElliotH on Friday October 26, 2012 @10:33AM (#4702280)
Steam doesn't actually own Steam.com The current owners won't sell it.
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by emperorcezar on Friday October 26, 2012 @10:38AM (#4702302)
Which is hilariously funny since there's nothing there but a drop page.
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by sliverstorm on Friday October 26, 2012 @09:53PM (#4705063)
Folks that do that kind of irritate me. Sure, you can do what you like with the domain, but it's like they are being uncooperative for the sake of being uncooperative.
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by mindslight on Friday October 26, 2012 @10:13PM (#4705097)

    % wc -l /etc/services 
    599 /etc/services
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by sliverstorm on Friday October 26, 2012 @10:40PM (#4705151)
Yes, this is true. It looks like steam.com wasn't the particular case I was thinking of; one such instance with what must have been another company, the landing page basically made it clear the owner was squatting the domain to piss of the company that wanted it.
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by drivebyacct2 on Friday October 26, 2012 @02:13PM (#4703444)
I wonder what they pay to serve it though, I wonder if there are enough hits to it for it to be non-trivial (where non-trivial for a drop site is more than spare change a month)
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by barbs on Friday October 26, 2012 @07:14PM (#4704688)
I'm curious as well. It's been like that for years from memory. What possible value could this site have for the owners? Apart from maybe trolling purposes? And just who are "Steam Tunnel Operations" anyway?
Re:Steam for Linux Beta by lambada on Saturday October 27, 2012 @01:26PM (#4706644)
They do have an MX record present, so it's possible that they still use email for some legitimate purpose. Bear in mind they've had the domain since 1994 apparently (according to a WHOIS lookup), that length of time makes it unlikely that it's purpose is illegitimate.